In this episode of Reimagining Company Culture, we spoke with Kristie Rodenbush, Chief Human Resources Officer at Algolia. Kristie has twenty years of HR experience across public and private tech companies, and she brings a CHRO-level view of what actually moves engagement at scale. Her framing of holistic engagement is not about adding more programs. It is about connecting the programs that already exist so they stop competing with each other.
What made the conversation useful is how clearly Kristie separates surface-level engagement work from the structural investment that produces durable change. Too many engagement programs get built in parallel, each one solving a narrow slice of the problem. Holistic engagement is what you get when those slices get wired together and the organization can see employees as whole people rather than a set of data points.
What Holistic Employee Engagement Actually Means
Holistic engagement is the set of operating practices that treat employees as individuals with careers, lives, relationships, and responsibilities beyond their job description. It covers work design, recognition, growth, wellbeing, and community. None of those are new ideas. The difference is that holistic engagement insists on integrating them so that the programs reinforce rather than compete.
The research keeps pointing in the same direction. Gallup's State of the Global Workplace reports global engagement at 21 percent and US engagement at an 11-year low. The top performers are not the ones with the most programs. They are the ones with the most coherent operating model around engagement.
Coherence matters because employees experience the organization as a whole. A strong recognition program paired with a weak performance management process produces mixed signals. A thoughtful wellbeing benefit paired with unclear workload expectations produces cynicism. Holistic engagement aligns the signals.
One point Kristie kept returning to is that holistic engagement requires a CHRO who can say no. There are always more programs to launch, and without editorial discipline the HR function ends up with a crowded portfolio that exhausts employees and delivers less than the simpler version would have. The best CHROs are good editors as much as they are good builders.
Editing the portfolio is not easy, because every program has sponsors inside the company. The way through is to be transparent about the tradeoff: every new program added without removing another one increases the maintenance load and dilutes the signal. Making that tradeoff visible gives leaders the data to make better choices.
How Holistic Engagement Shows Up in Practice
What is the difference between engagement and holistic engagement?
Engagement is usually a score. Holistic engagement is a practice. The score is the output. The practice is everything that produces it: how work is designed, how managers coach, how growth gets planned, how cases get handled, how benefits get shaped.
How do you move from siloed engagement programs to a holistic practice?
Start by mapping the programs that already exist across HR, benefits, DEI, and communications. Most organizations find three or four programs that overlap and two or three gaps that no one owns. Consolidation and gap-filling beats adding new programs.
What Actually Works When Building Holistic Engagement
Principle 1: Design around the manager
The manager is the unit where holistic engagement either works or falls apart. Deloitte's workplace well-being research shows that employees expect their manager to carry real responsibility for wellbeing, and holistic engagement treats the manager as the integration point for recognition, growth, and wellbeing, not as a separate audience.
Principle 2: Connect engagement data to case data
Engagement surveys tell you how employees feel. Case data tells you what they do when the feeling gets bad enough. A unified case management platform lets HR leaders connect the two views and respond before the pattern becomes an attrition problem.
Principle 3: Publish the theory, not just the program
Employees engage more fully with programs when they understand the theory behind them. Explain why the organization is investing in a specific capability, what the research says, and what leaders expect to see. Treating employees as intelligent adults is a surprisingly rare engagement move.
Pair this with discipline around retention strategy and culture-focused operating models to give the holistic experience a structural backbone rather than a set of parallel programs.
Where Employee Relations Fits
ER is often the last line that sees when engagement has deteriorated into something more serious. A rising case load in a specific team is a louder signal than a dipping survey score, because it reflects actual behavior rather than reported sentiment. Teams working through a structured engagement operating model and a strong ER function can catch these patterns early.
ER drill-down: linking case volume to engagement initiatives
Every engagement program should have a secondary measure on the ER side. If the program is working, the expectation is a modest reduction in preventable case volume within two to three quarters. If the ER volume does not move, the program is producing survey lift without behavioral change, which is a warning sign, not a success.
Another practical angle is the way holistic engagement handles hybrid and remote work. Employees working in different modes need different supports, and the one-size-fits-all engagement program usually produces worse outcomes than a slightly more targeted one. Holistic engagement adjusts for mode of work without fragmenting into dozens of sub-programs.
Frequently Asked Questions About Holistic Engagement
Is holistic engagement different from employee experience?
Closely related but not identical. Employee experience focuses on every touchpoint an employee has with the organization. Holistic engagement focuses on the subset of those touchpoints that produce emotional and behavioral investment. Strong employee experience design makes holistic engagement easier.
Can you measure holistic engagement with a single score?
No, and you should not try. A single score hides the differences between teams, managers, and tenure bands. Use three to five items that together cover sentiment, growth, wellbeing, and intent to stay, and report them alongside each other.
How do managers fit into holistic engagement?
Managers are the integration point. The programs matter, but the integration happens in 1:1s, team meetings, and the small daily interactions between a manager and their team. Invest in manager capability first.
Is holistic engagement the same across industries?The principles are consistent, but the emphasis shifts. Manufacturing and healthcare teams prioritize safety, scheduling, and workload. Technology teams prioritize growth, autonomy, and purpose. The operating model should adapt, even if the underlying frame does not.How does holistic engagement interact with DEI?
Poor DEI outcomes almost always show up first in engagement scores for specific groups. Holistic engagement without DEI is a partial program. DEI without engagement is a strategy without a delivery mechanism. Both need to be in the operating model.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Kristie's lens is the lens of a CHRO who has watched engagement programs fail in predictable ways. The failures are almost never about bad programs. They are about disconnected programs, missing ownership, and the absence of a strong manager layer to hold it all together.
Holistic engagement is not a marketing frame. It is a discipline that requires HR leaders to do the harder work of consolidation, manager investment, and honest measurement. The payoff is real, but it is not fast, and it is not free.
The best signal that holistic engagement is working is that the organization stops talking about engagement in binary terms and starts talking about it as an operating reality. That shift takes years. It is also the thing that ultimately produces the retention, performance, and culture outcomes leaders say they want.
See how AllVoices helps HR leaders connect engagement and ER data into a coherent operating rhythm.
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
