
California Labor Laws 2026: A Complete Guide for HR & Employer Compliance



Accurate as of May 1, 2026. This guide is informational and not legal advice. For specific situations, consult licensed California employment counsel.
California has the most complex employment law framework in the United States. The state regulates nearly every aspect of the employment relationship, often at thresholds far below federal law, and the legislature passes new requirements every single year. Small compliance mistakes create large liabilities here.
The answer to "what does the law require?" almost always starts with three questions: how big is your workforce, what city are your employees in, and which statute applies first. This guide answers those questions across every major topic California HR teams need to own in 2026 — wages, overtime, leave, discrimination, workplace safety, hiring, contractor classification, and enforcement.
If you handle complaints, investigations, leave requests, or terminations in California, the documentation that becomes your defense in an FEHA charge or PAGA case lives in a purpose-built HR case management platform. The detail on why that matters is woven throughout this guide.
California's January 1, 2026 effective date brought more simultaneous changes than most years. Several are major structural shifts — not just dollar-amount adjustments.
Every item above gets full treatment in the relevant section below.
California's statewide minimum wage is set in Labor Code § 1182.12 and adjusts annually for inflation. The 2026 rate is $16.90 per hour, up from $16.50 in 2025. That single number anchors a cascade of other thresholds — the exempt salary floor, the CBA exemption trigger, and certain overtime calculation baselines.
California has separate minimum wage floors for fast food and healthcare workers that apply on top of — and exceed — the statewide rate.
The fast food rate of $20.00/hour was established by AB 1228 in 2024 and is overseen by the Fast Food Council. The healthcare worker rate under SB 525 varies by facility type, with separate scales for large hospitals, dialysis clinics, community clinics, and other healthcare settings. Healthcare facilities see another scheduled increase on July 1, 2026. Employers in these industries should track their applicable rate separately and not rely on the general statewide floor.
California does not allow employers to count tips toward the minimum wage. Tipped employees must receive at least the full state or local minimum wage as direct cash pay, and tips remain the property of the employee under Labor Code § 351. Tip pooling among employees is allowed — but managers, supervisors, and owners may not participate in tip pools.
Under California's white-collar exemption, an employee must earn at least twice the state minimum wage for full-time employment to qualify as exempt. For 2026, that's $70,304 annually ($1,352 weekly). The federal threshold of $684/week ($35,568 annually) does not satisfy California law. An employee who fails the salary test is automatically nonexempt — regardless of job title or duties — and becomes eligible for all wage-and-hour protections.
Misclassification at the salary level creates immediate exposure to unpaid overtime, meal and rest break premiums, wage statement penalties, and PAGA liability.
Roughly 40 California cities maintain their own minimum wage ordinances. Where local rates exceed the state floor, the local rate applies. Coverage is triggered by where the work is performed — not where the employer is headquartered. Most ordinances cover any employee who performs at least two hours of work in the city during a given workweek.
Major 2026 local rates:
Employers with remote or mobile workforces need to track location-based hours carefully. An employee who spends two hours per week working from a San Francisco coffee shop triggers that city's minimum wage for those hours.
California's overtime rules go further than the federal FLSA. State law creates premium pay obligations based on daily hours, weekly hours, and consecutive days worked — whichever produces the highest premium in any given period. The rules sit in Labor Code §§ 510 and 511 and the relevant Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders.
The "regular rate" is broader than most employers assume. It includes nondiscretionary bonuses, shift differentials, and certain other forms of pay — not just the hourly base rate. Miscalculating the regular rate is one of the most common audit findings in California wage and hour investigations.
Comp time in lieu of overtime pay is generally unlawful in the California private sector. Limited written-agreement exceptions exist but are narrow and rarely applicable.
California employers can adopt a written alternative workweek schedule — such as four 10-hour days — that allows employees to work up to 10 hours per day without incurring daily overtime. The process requires a secret-ballot election with two-thirds approval from the affected work unit, proper DIR notice and reporting, and a written agreement. The election rules are technical and easy to violate. A defective alternative workweek election reverts employees to standard daily overtime rules retroactively.
California requires unpaid meal periods and paid rest breaks under Labor Code § 512 and the Wage Orders. Failure to provide either triggers a one-hour premium payment at the employee's regular rate of pay for each missed break — separately for each missed meal and each missed rest break, per workday.
The meal period must be uninterrupted and the employee must be fully relieved of all duties. An employee eating at their workstation while fielding phone calls does not satisfy the rule.
Rest breaks should fall in the middle of each work period when practicable. Employees must be fully relieved of all duties during rest breaks, and breaks are paid at the regular rate.
If an employer fails to provide a required meal period or rest break, the employee is owed one additional hour of pay at the regular rate for each violation per workday. The California Supreme Court confirmed in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services (2022) that meal and rest break premiums are wages — not penalties — which means they count toward the regular rate for overtime calculations and accrue waiting time penalties at separation. A missed break is not a small-dollar issue in California.
Labor Code § 226 requires itemized wage statements with specific information for every pay period. Wage statement violations are a frequent anchor for PAGA notices because they are easy to identify and apply across an entire workforce at once.
Employers must provide a copy at the time wages are paid and keep records for at least 3 years. Employees can request their wage statement records; the employer has 21 calendar days to comply.
Section 226 violations carry statutory penalties of $50 for the first violation and $100 for each subsequent violation, up to $4,000 per employee, plus attorney's fees. PAGA penalties stack on top of those damages. The post-2024 PAGA reforms created cure procedures for some wage statement defects, but only for employers who can demonstrate they took all reasonable steps to comply before the notice was filed.
California has some of the strictest final paycheck timing rules in the country. Late final paychecks trigger waiting time penalties under Labor Code § 203: the employee's daily wage continues to accrue as a penalty for each day the wages remain unpaid, up to 30 calendar days.
"All wages" includes accrued and unused vacation and PTO under Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up. California treats vacation as a form of earned compensation that vests as it accrues — unused balances must be paid out at separation. Floating holidays generally count; specifically designated paid sick leave does not.
If an employer willfully fails to pay all wages on time at separation, the employee continues to earn their daily wage as a penalty for up to 30 calendar days. An employee earning $300/day whose final paycheck is delayed two weeks faces a $9,000 penalty — before the underlying wage claim is calculated.
Iloff v. LaPaix (2025) clarified that a "good faith dispute" defense to waiting time penalties requires an actual factual dispute about whether wages were owed — not just a bookkeeping mistake or administrative delay.
Labor Code § 2810.5 requires employers to give every nonexempt employee a written notice at hire covering specific employment information. The DLSE provides a template — commonly called the Wage Theft Notice or Notice to Employee.
The notice must include:
Employers must provide an updated notice within 7 calendar days of any change to the listed information — unless the change is reflected on a timely wage statement.
California has had a pay transparency law since 2023, requiring employers to post pay scales in job postings. SB 642, effective January 1, 2026, significantly strengthens those requirements and expands the Equal Pay Act. SB 464 expands pay data reporting starting with 2027 filings.
Employers with 15 or more employees must include the pay scale for a position in any job posting under Labor Code § 432.3. SB 642 codifies that "pay scale" means a good faith estimate of the salary or hourly wage range the employer reasonably expects to pay upon hire. Generic wide ranges that don't reflect actual hiring intent no longer satisfy the requirement. Employers must also provide the pay scale to current employees upon request and maintain records of job titles and wage rate history for the duration of employment plus 3 years.
Labor Code § 1197.5 prohibits paying employees of "another sex" (SB 642 replaced "opposite sex" with this language) less than employees performing substantially similar work. Legitimate differentials based on seniority, merit, or production systems remain valid defenses.
SB 642 amendments effective January 1, 2026:
Private employers with 100 or more employees must submit annual pay data reports to the California Civil Rights Department. SB 464 expands the required number of job categories from 10 to 23 starting with reports filed in 2027 (covering 2026 data). The reporting requirement applies separately for employers using labor contractors with 100 or more workers.
SB 294 created a new standalone written notice obligation for essentially every California employer. The Labor Commissioner's Office published a template notice employers can use.
The notice covers workers' compensation rights, immigration agency inspection rights, union organizing and concerted activity rights, and constitutional rights during law enforcement interactions at or during work.
SB 294 also requires employers to give employees the opportunity to designate an emergency contact to be notified if the employee is arrested or detained at work or during work hours and the employer has actual knowledge of the event. Existing employees: opportunity to designate by March 30, 2026. New employees: at the time of hire. Civil penalties for non-compliance: up to $500 per employee per violation, up to $10,000 per employee for certain violations.
AB 692, effective January 1, 2026, voids most employment contract provisions that require an employee to repay training, recruiting, relocation, or similar costs if they leave within a specified period. These "stay-or-pay" or "training repayment agreement provisions" (TRAPs) drew growing criticism — and NLRB attention — before California acted.
Narrow exceptions exist for genuine educational or licensing programs that primarily benefit the employee and meet specific statutory criteria. Every employment agreement, offer letter, sign-on bonus letter, training agreement, and tuition reimbursement policy should be audited against AB 692 before the next hiring cycle.
The California Family Rights Act provides 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave under Government Code § 12945.2. CFRA covers far more employers than the federal FMLA — it applies at a 5-employee threshold versus FMLA's 50-employee/75-mile rule — and its definition of "family member" is significantly broader.
"Family member" under CFRA includes spouse, registered domestic partner, child of any age, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, parent-in-law, and a "designated person" (one designation per 12-month period).
The Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act (Labor Code §§ 245–249) requires almost every California employer to provide paid sick leave. The 2024 expansion increased the minimum to 5 days or 40 hours annually. AB 406, effective January 1, 2026, expands the permitted uses and shifts enforcement to the FEHA framework — giving the Civil Rights Department broader authority over violations.
All information related to an employee's status as a victim or the reasons for safe-time leave must be kept strictly confidential.
San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, Emeryville, San Diego, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Long Beach, and other cities maintain local paid sick leave ordinances exceeding the state minimum. Multi-city employers must track local ordinances separately and apply the most generous rule for each work location.
California's Paid Family Leave (PFL) and State Disability Insurance (SDI) programs provide partial wage replacement funded through employee payroll deductions. Pregnancy Disability Leave (PDL) is a separate job-protection statute. All three interact in ways that require careful layering.
Qualifying reasons include caring for a seriously ill family member, bonding with a new child, and certain military exigencies. As of January 1, 2025, employers can no longer require employees to use up to two weeks of accrued vacation before receiving PFL benefits.
SB 590, effective July 1, 2028, will allow employees to designate a "designated person" (similar to CFRA) for PFL caregiving leave. Update PFL policies before that date.
SDI provides partial wage replacement when an employee cannot work due to a non-work-related illness, injury, or pregnancy-related condition. The 2026 SDI contribution rate is 1.3% of wages with no taxable wage cap. The maximum weekly benefit is $1,765 and the maximum benefit period is 52 weeks. SDI provides income replacement, not job protection — separate leave laws handle reinstatement rights.
PDL under Government Code § 12945 provides up to 4 months (17⅓ weeks) of unpaid, job-protected leave for any employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. Coverage threshold: employers with 5 or more employees, with no tenure or hours-worked requirement. PDL can stack with CFRA bonding leave to produce up to 7 months of total job-protected leave for a birth parent.
The result: up to 7 months of job-protected leave for a birth parent, with partial wage replacement available throughout most of that period via SDI and PFL.
California has more individual leave statutes than any other state. Most apply to specific circumstances and run concurrently with other leaves where applicable.
Employers with 5 or more employees must provide up to 5 days of bereavement leave for the death of a family member (spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, domestic partner, parent-in-law) under AB 1949. The leave can be unpaid, but the employee may use available paid sick leave, vacation, or PTO. Leave must be completed within 3 months of the death.
SB 848 created leave for employees who experience a miscarriage, failed adoption, failed surrogacy, stillbirth, or unsuccessful assisted reproduction. Employers with 5 or more employees must provide up to 5 days of leave per loss event. The leave may be unpaid, but the employee may use available paid leave. An employee may take up to 20 days of reproductive loss leave in a 12-month period.
Labor Code § 230 prohibits employers from discharging or discriminating against an employee for taking time off for jury duty or to appear as a witness under a subpoena. Employees must give reasonable advance notice.
Elections Code § 14000 allows employees up to 2 hours of paid time off to vote if they don't have sufficient time outside working hours. Employers may designate the time at the beginning or end of the shift and must post a notice 10 days before each statewide election.
Labor Code §§ 230 and 230.1 protect employees who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, or other crimes. Employers may not discharge, discriminate, or retaliate against employees who take time off to obtain protective orders, seek medical attention, get counseling, attend court proceedings, or address safety concerns. Employers with 25 or more employees must allow time off for these purposes. Under the AB 406 expansion (2026), paid sick leave can now cover many of these absences.
California's Military and Veterans Code § 394 provides job protection for employees on military duty, supplementing federal USERRA. California also has a Military Spouse Leave law providing up to 10 unpaid days off when a military spouse is on leave from deployment — for employers with 25 or more employees.
Labor Code § 230.8 requires employers with 25 or more employees to allow up to 40 hours per year of unpaid time off for parents and guardians to attend school or licensed daycare activities for their children, with caps per occurrence.
Labor Code § 1510 requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide up to 30 business days of paid organ donation leave and 5 business days of paid bone marrow donation leave in any 12-month period. This leave is in addition to other leaves and may not be charged against PTO or sick leave.
The Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12940 et seq.) is California's primary anti-discrimination law. The Civil Rights Department (CRD) enforces it. FEHA covers more employers, more protected classes, and more situations than federal Title VII or the ADA — often by a significant margin.
FEHA protects employees from discrimination, harassment, and retaliation based on:
SB 1137 made California the first state to explicitly recognize intersectional discrimination — discrimination based on the combination of two or more protected characteristics. AB 1815 clarified the CROWN Act by removing the word "historically" from its description of hair traits associated with race, broadening the scope of protection.
FEHA prohibits harassment based on any protected characteristic. Sexual harassment is the most litigated category, but FEHA covers race, religion, age, disability, and every other class with equal force. Harassment protections apply to every employer regardless of size and extend to applicants, unpaid interns, volunteers, and independent contractors.
The two most common harassment theories are quid pro quo harassment — where job benefits are conditioned on submitting to unwanted conduct — and hostile work environment harassment, where pervasive conduct creates an abusive atmosphere. Both require a fast, documented response. The warning signs of a hostile work environment are worth knowing before an incident escalates into a formal complaint.
Documentation is the employer's primary defense. A structured workflow for complaint intake, investigation, and resolution is what turns a defensible response into actual evidence when the CRD or a plaintiff's attorney asks to see it. For a complete investigation framework, the Definitive Guide to Conducting Workplace Investigations walks through scoping, interviews, evidence handling, and report writing.
SB 553, codified at Labor Code § 6401.9, requires almost every California employer to maintain a written Workplace Violence Prevention Plan, train employees on it, and keep a Violent Incident Log. The law took effect July 1, 2024 and is enforced by Cal/OSHA.
SB 553 applies to nearly all California employers. Exemptions include:
An employer with even one customer-facing location does not qualify for the small-employer exemption. The exemption is for back-office or fully remote operations only.
Employers must maintain a log of every workplace violence incident, retained for at least 5 years. Each entry must include:
AllVoices offers a dedicated SB 553 compliance workflow that captures incident reports, generates the Violent Incident Log, and documents training completion.
SB 553 also expanded the workplace violence restraining order process under Code of Civil Procedure § 527.8, allowing collective bargaining representatives to seek temporary restraining orders on behalf of employees as of January 1, 2025.
The Fair Chance Act prohibits employers with 5 or more employees from asking about or considering an applicant's criminal history before extending a conditional offer. After a conditional offer, the employer may run a background check and consider criminal history — but must follow a multi-step process if considering rescinding the offer.
Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego each have local ban-the-box ordinances with additional requirements. The LA Fair Chance Initiative for Hiring Ordinance covers smaller employers and adds further notice obligations.
Labor Code § 432.3 prohibits California employers from asking applicants about salary history. Employers must also provide the pay scale for a position to applicants upon reasonable request after an initial interview. Voluntary disclosure of salary history by an applicant does not violate the law and can be considered — but the employer cannot solicit it.
California's Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA) layered on top of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) creates a two-statute compliance regime for background checks. Required steps include a standalone written disclosure and authorization, pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report, a waiting period for the candidate to respond, and a final adverse action notice. The social media background screening rules have their own restrictions — employers generally cannot require applicants to provide social media login credentials.
SB 1100 amended FEHA to prohibit employers from requiring a driver's license for a position unless (1) driving is a reasonably expected job function, AND (2) using alternative transportation would not be comparable in travel time or cost. "Valid driver's license required" can no longer appear in a job posting for roles where driving is incidental.
AB 2188, in effect since January 1, 2024, amends FEHA to prohibit discrimination against an employee or applicant based on off-duty, off-premises cannabis use or a drug screen that detects non-psychoactive cannabis metabolites (which can persist for days or weeks after use).
Employers may still:
Pre-employment drug testing panels that detect only THC metabolites — without an impairment test — no longer support a hiring or termination decision in most California workplaces. Exemptions include employees in the building and construction trades and positions requiring federal background clearance or DOT-regulated drug testing.
California uses the strict ABC test from Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court, codified by AB 5 and amended by AB 2257, to determine worker classification under the Labor Code, Unemployment Insurance Code, and most Wage Orders.
A worker is presumed to be an employee unless the hiring entity proves all three:
Factor B is the hardest to satisfy. A software company hiring a developer, a marketing firm hiring a copywriter, or a delivery service hiring drivers will struggle to show the work is "outside the usual course of business."
AB 2257 created a long list of occupational exemptions that fall back to the older multifactor Borello test, including licensed professionals (doctors, lawyers, accountants, architects, engineers), real estate licensees, direct sales workers, and certain professional services relationships meeting a 12-factor test. Each exemption has its own criteria — usually requiring a written contract, separate business location, independent rate-setting, and several other elements.
AB 809, effective January 1, 2026, clarifies that a worker's ownership of their own vehicle does not, by itself, make them an independent contractor — and reaffirms the employer's duty to reimburse documented personal vehicle use costs under Labor Code § 2802.
Misclassification creates immediate exposure to unpaid overtime, meal and rest break premiums, missed wage statements, unpaid SDI/PFL/UI contributions, and PAGA penalties. SB 459 imposes additional civil penalties of $5,000 to $25,000 per willful misclassification violation.
The Private Attorneys General Act (Labor Code § 2698 et seq.) deputizes individual employees to enforce the Labor Code on behalf of the state. AB 2288 and SB 92, signed July 1, 2024, made the most significant PAGA reforms in two decades. The reforms apply to notices filed on or after June 19, 2024.
Post-reform, a PAGA plaintiff must have personally suffered each Labor Code violation alleged. Plaintiffs can no longer bring representative claims for violations they did not personally experience — except when represented by qualifying nonprofit legal aid organizations that have litigated PAGA actions for at least 5 years.
Employers who can demonstrate they took "all reasonable steps" to comply can cap their PAGA exposure:
"All reasonable steps" includes periodic payroll audits, written wage-and-hour policies, supervisor training, and documented corrective action. Centralizing those audits and corrective actions in a single case management system makes the "reasonable steps" defense far more credible when the LWDA or a court asks for evidence.
The LWDA proposed additional PAGA regulations in February 2026 that would tighten high-frequency filer rules and add structure to the cure process. Those regulations are not yet final.
California has the broadest non-compete agreement prohibition in the country. Business and Professions Code § 16600 voids every contract restraining engagement in a lawful profession, trade, or business — with only narrow statutory exceptions.
Narrowly tailored confidentiality provisions and IP assignment clauses remain enforceable. Trade secret protection through the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civil Code § 3426) is still the appropriate tool for protecting legitimate business interests.
SB 699 creates a private right of action for employees, applicants, and prospective employees. Damages include actual damages, attorney's fees, and costs. Attempting to enforce a void non-compete also constitutes unfair competition under Business and Professions Code § 17200.
California operates its own state-plan OSHA program — the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) — which enforces standards that are at least as effective as federal OSHA and in many cases more stringent.
California Code of Regulations title 8, § 3203 requires virtually every California employer to maintain a written IIPP. The plan must include an identified responsible person, an employee compliance system, a communication system, hazard identification procedures, injury investigation procedures, hazard correction methods, training provisions, and recordkeeping. There is no minimum employee threshold — essentially every employer in California must have a written IIPP.
California's Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (Labor Code § 1400 et seq.) is broader than the federal WARN Act. Cal-WARN applies to smaller employers and smaller workforce reductions.
Effective January 1, 2026, Cal-WARN notices must include:
Failure to provide proper notice creates liability for back pay and benefits to each affected employee for the violation period, up to 60 days. Civil penalties of up to $500 per day may also apply for failure to notify the local government.
Under Labor Code § 1198.5, employees have the right to inspect and receive copies of their personnel records. Employers must respond within 30 calendar days. Under Labor Code § 226, employees can request itemized wage statement copies — the employer must provide them within 21 calendar days; failure triggers a $750 penalty in addition to actual damages.
California's compliance risks concentrate where documentation matters most: harassment investigations, accommodation interactions, leave administration, retaliation claims, and termination decisions. The penalty structures under FEHA, PAGA, SB 553, and California's wage statutes all reward employers who can produce a clear, contemporaneous, defensible record — and punish those who can't.
AllVoices centralizes employee reports, investigations, performance management, and case documentation in one place, with an audit trail that holds up under scrutiny. Here's where the platform directly addresses California's compliance requirements:
California-headquartered teams including Intercom and TrueCar use AllVoices to keep employee relations consistent across hundreds of cases per year. For a deeper look at how legal, compliance, and people teams structure this work, the Essential Guide to Managing Employee Relations Issues and the Handbook for New Employee Relations Managers are good starting points.
The California statewide minimum wage is $16.90 per hour as of January 1, 2026, applicable to all employers regardless of size. Local ordinances in cities like San Diego ($17.75), San Jose ($18.45), and others require higher rates. Industry-specific minimums apply to fast food workers ($20.00) and healthcare workers ($18.63 to $24.00 depending on facility type, with another increase July 1, 2026). The minimum salary threshold for exempt employees is $70,304 annually.
California requires overtime based on daily hours and consecutive days worked — not just weekly hours. Nonexempt employees earn 1.5x for hours over 8 in a workday, over 40 in a workweek, or for the first 8 hours on the seventh consecutive day. Double time (2x) applies for hours over 12 in a workday or hours over 8 on the seventh consecutive day. The federal FLSA only requires overtime for hours over 40 per week. California does not allow comp time in the private sector.
Yes. The HWHFA requires almost every California employer to provide at least 5 days or 40 hours of paid sick leave per year, accruing at 1 hour per 30 hours worked. AB 406, effective January 1, 2026, expanded the permitted uses to include broader safe-time categories for crime victims and family members involved in criminal proceedings. Several cities have local ordinances providing even more generous benefits. Paid sick leave does not need to be cashed out at termination.
SB 553 (Labor Code § 6401.9), effective July 1, 2024, requires nearly every California employer to maintain a written Workplace Violence Prevention Plan, train employees on it annually, and keep a Violent Incident Log of every workplace violence incident for 5 years. Exemptions apply to workplaces with fewer than 10 employees not accessible to the public, remote workers, and healthcare facilities covered by the healthcare-specific standard. Cal/OSHA enforces the law with penalties up to $25,000 for serious violations and up to $158,727 for willful violations.
Yes — FEHA applies to employers with 5 or more employees for discrimination claims and to all employers regardless of size for harassment claims. FEHA covers more protected classes than federal Title VII, provides a 3-year filing deadline (compared to 180–300 days federally), and carries no caps on compensatory or punitive damages.
AB 2288 and SB 92, effective for PAGA notices filed on or after June 19, 2024, made significant changes: stricter standing (plaintiffs must personally suffer each alleged violation), penalty caps for good-faith compliance (15% pre-notice, 30% within 60 days post-notice), expanded cure procedures for employers with fewer than 100 employees, and a new 65/35 allocation of penalties between the state and aggrieved employees.
Almost never. Business and Professions Code § 16600 voids post-employment non-competes with very limited exceptions. SB 699 (effective 2024) makes it unlawful to enforce a non-compete against a California employee even if the agreement was signed in another state. AB 1076 required employers to notify current and former employees that existing non-competes are void. Attempting to enforce a void non-compete is an act of unfair competition under California law.
AB 692, effective January 1, 2026, voids most provisions that require employees to repay training, recruiting, relocation, or similar costs if they leave employment within a specified time. Employers should audit every offer letter, sign-on bonus letter, training agreement, and tuition reimbursement policy. Narrow exceptions exist for genuinely portable educational programs that primarily benefit the employee.
California's employment law framework rewards documentation, consistency, and proactive compliance. The same employer behavior that produces a $5,000 penalty in another state can produce a $500,000 PAGA case in California — and the difference is often whether the employer can show a written policy, training records, and contemporaneous case documentation.
The 2026 priorities for California HR teams:
To manage California compliance with the documentation rigor these laws require, see how AllVoices' HR case management platform handles complaint intake, investigations, and recordkeeping for California teams at scale.
Stay up to date on Employee Relations news
Sign up to our newsletter