Washington Labor Laws 2026: A Complete Guide for HR & Employer Compliance
.png)
.png)
Accurate as of May 1, 2026. This guide is informational and not legal advice. For specific situations, consult licensed Washington employment counsel.
Washington runs one of the most distinctive employment law frameworks in the country, and the gap between the state floor and the federal floor is wider here than almost anywhere else. The state minimum wage hit $17.13 on January 1, 2026, the highest state rate in the United States, with Tukwila, Seattle, Renton, and SeaTac all paying more on top of that. The white-collar salary threshold for exempt status climbed to $80,168.40 per year, more than twice the federal floor. Paid Family and Medical Leave premiums rose to 1.13% of wages, the WA Cares Fund continues collecting 0.58% for long-term care benefits launching July 2026, and pay transparency, salary history, and non-compete rules each layer their own discipline on hiring.
The 2025 legislative session pushed the framework further. Governor Ferguson signed amendments to Paid Family and Medical Leave (HB 1213), the Equal Pay and Opportunities Act (SSB 5408), the Fair Chance Act (HB 1747), the Healthy Starts Act (SB 5217), the Domestic Violence Leave Act (SB 5101 covering hate crime victims), and immigration coercion protections (SSB 5104). Effective dates land across 2025, 2026, and 2027. Personnel file access rules tightened under SHB 1308. Hospital meal and rest break rules under RCW 49.12.480 took effect January 1, 2026.
This guide walks through the Washington-specific employment law landscape an HR team needs in 2026. It covers wages and hours, leave, discrimination, accommodations, hiring rules, layoffs, safety, retaliation, and the agencies that enforce each layer. For the federal baseline that sits underneath every Washington rule, the federal labor law guide is the right companion.
Several Washington-level changes in the past 18 months reshape how compliance work gets prioritized. None of these rewrote a chapter from scratch, but each of them moved the practical line on what HR needs to watch.
The detail on each item, plus the rest of the Washington framework, follows below.
Washington's minimum wage is set by RCW 49.46.020 and adjusted annually by L&I using the federal Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). For calendar year 2026 the rate is $17.13 per hour, effective January 1.
Workers aged 14 or 15 may be paid 85% of the adult minimum, or $14.56 per hour in 2026. Workers age 16 and older receive the full state minimum.
Several Washington cities and one county set their own minimum wages above the state floor. Effective January 1, 2026:
Pay the higher of state, local, or any applicable federal contractor rate. For multi-site Washington employers, set up payroll location codes that map to the highest applicable rate per worksite.
Washington does not allow a tip credit. Under RCW 49.46.020, employers must pay the full state minimum wage in cash before tips. Tips and service charges paid to employees are in addition to, and may not count toward, the hourly minimum.
Tip pooling is permitted among employees, but managerial or supervisory employees who meet the EAP exemption under RCW 49.46.010(3)(c) cannot share in pools. Employers may not keep any portion of tips received by their workers, and credit card processing fees cannot be deducted from tips.
Washington's white-collar exemption uses a salary threshold tied to the state minimum wage rather than a fixed federal dollar figure. For 2026 the threshold equals 2.25 times the state minimum, which works out to:
Both numbers run well above the federal FLSA standards ($684 per week and $27.63 per hour respectively), so a Washington employee can be classified as exempt under federal law and still owed overtime under state law. Employers default to whichever rule produces the higher pay or more protection for the worker.
Salary alone is never enough. Each Washington exemption category, like the federal one, requires a duties test. Executive, administrative, learned and creative professional, outside sales, and computer employee categories track the federal definitions but with Washington's higher salary floor and a state-law duties analysis administered by L&I.
A misclassified worker is owed unpaid overtime at 1.5 times the regular rate for hours over 40 per week, double damages under RCW 49.52, attorneys' fees, and interest. State limitations periods reach back three years. The HR compliance audit overview walks through how exemption status typically becomes a finding in a state wage audit.
Non-exempt employees earn 1.5 times the regular rate for hours worked over 40 in a workweek. Washington does not impose daily overtime the way California does. Industry-specific rules layer on for agricultural workers, healthcare workers, and certain transportation jobs, with separate calculation regimes administered by L&I.
RCW 49.46.200 and 49.46.210 require every Washington employer to provide paid sick leave to non-exempt employees, with no employer-size minimum. Coverage is universal across the private sector.
Paid sick leave can be used for the employee's own health condition, care for a family member, closure of the workplace or a child's school by public health order, absences related to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and, after the 2025 expansion, certain immigration proceedings.
"Family member" is defined broadly: a child, parent, spouse or registered domestic partner, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, or any other person whose close association is the equivalent of a family relationship.
Washington PFML, codified at RCW Title 50A, provides up to 12 weeks of paid medical or family leave per year, with a combined maximum of 16 weeks (18 weeks for pregnancy-related incapacity). It is funded by a payroll premium administered by the Employment Security Department.
Workers qualify after at least 820 hours in their qualifying period (the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters, or the last four completed quarters). Hours from multiple jobs combine, so a worker who pieces together two part-time jobs can still hit 820 hours.
Washington PFML originally tied job restoration to the same coverage thresholds as federal FMLA. HB 1213 changed that. Effective January 1, 2026, PFML job protection reaches:
Workers gain job protection after at least 180 calendar days with the employer, down from the 12-month FMLA standard. HB 1213 also tightened benefits-continuation rules and added language addressing leave stacking when PFML and FMLA do not run concurrently.
PFML covers the worker's own serious health condition, the birth or placement of a child for adoption or foster care, care for a family member with a serious health condition, qualifying military exigency, and bereavement leave for a child whose birth or placement triggered eligibility.
The WA Cares Fund is the country's first state-administered long-term care insurance program, established by RCW 50B.04 and funded by a mandatory payroll premium. The fund is administered by the Employment Security Department.
Employers process WA Cares premiums through the same payroll mechanism as PFML. The two programs are separate but use coordinated reporting through paidleave.wa.gov. Misreporting WA Cares premiums carries the same penalties as PFML misreporting.
Chapter 49.58 RCW, the Washington Equal Pay and Opportunities Act (EPOA), is significantly broader than the federal Equal Pay Act and reaches further than most state pay equity statutes.
RCW 49.58.110 requires employers with 15 or more employees to disclose, in each job posting, the wage scale or salary range for the position plus a general description of all benefits and other compensation. The duty applies to postings for new positions and internal transfers alike.
SSB 5408, signed in April 2025, made several changes that took effect July 27, 2025:
RCW 49.58.070 sets the penalty: $5,000 per violation in addition to actual damages, and the law creates a private right of action. Class-action filings have already taken aim at high-volume Washington job posting practices.
RCW 49.58.100 prohibits employers from seeking the wage or salary history of an applicant. The prohibition reaches both direct questions and information requests routed through agencies, references, or third parties. Employers may verify salary history once the applicant has volunteered the information or once a job offer with a compensation amount has been made.
RCW 49.58.040 prohibits employers from restricting employees from discussing their wages or signing nondisclosure agreements covering pay. The protection layers on top of the National Labor Relations Act's Section 7 protection for concerted wage discussions.
Chapter 49.62 RCW imposes some of the country's strictest non-compete rules. The defining feature is a wage threshold below which non-compete covenants are void and unenforceable.
L&I publishes annual CPI-W adjustments to the threshold by September 30 each year. For 2026:
Below those numbers, the covenant is void as a matter of law regardless of consideration, geographic limit, or duration.
Even where the earnings threshold is met, the statute imposes procedural requirements:
The statute permits non-solicitation of customers and confidentiality covenants under separate, less restrictive standards. Garden-leave provisions remain enforceable if drafted carefully against the layoff-pay rule.
Chapter 49.60 RCW, the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), is enforced by the Washington State Human Rights Commission and reaches private employers with 8 or more employees. That headcount floor sits well below Title VII's 15-employee threshold, sweeping a much larger swath of small-employer activity into state coverage.
WLAD's list of protected classes runs longer than federal law and includes:
Recent legislative additions matter. Washington added "race" inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including hair texture and protective hairstyles, mirroring the CROWN Act movement. Citizenship status was added as a separate protected class. Familial status protections sweep into rental and credit decisions but also reach hiring decisions where the employer is asking about caregiving responsibilities.
Three structural differences matter for HR work in Washington:
A worker can file with the Washington State Human Rights Commission, which enforces WLAD administratively, or proceed directly to state court without exhausting administrative remedies.
RCW 43.10.005, the Healthy Starts Act, requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers and employees with pregnancy-related conditions. SB 5217, signed in 2025, expanded the framework substantially.
The statute identifies four accommodations for which employers may not require medical verification or claim undue hardship:
A second tier permits employers to require medical verification and to claim undue hardship. These accommodations include:
SB 5217 also mandated paid lactation breaks and added an explicit obligation to give "reasonable consideration" to any further pregnancy accommodation an employee requests, drawing on resources published by L&I and the employee's healthcare provider.
Pregnancy discrimination in hiring, firing, and other terms of employment remains separately prohibited by WLAD and Title VII. The Healthy Starts Act adds the affirmative accommodation duty on top. The pregnancy discrimination playbook walks through how the two regimes interact.
Chapter 49.76 RCW, Washington's Domestic Violence Leave Act, provides job-protected leave for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and for family members of victims. Effective January 1, 2026, SB 5101 expanded the law to cover victims of hate crimes and bias incidents and their family members.
An employee may take reasonable leave from work, intermittent leave, or leave on a reduced leave schedule, with or without pay, for purposes including:
Employees must give advance notice consistent with the employer's stated policy. Where advance notice is impossible due to emergency or unforeseen circumstances, notice must be provided no later than the end of the first day of leave. Employers may require verification, with options including a police report, court order, healthcare provider statement, or written statement from the employee.
Employers must maintain confidentiality of all information provided by the employee, including the fact that the employee or family member is a victim. Health insurance must continue at the same level and conditions as if the employee had not taken leave.
RCW 49.76.040 also requires reasonable safety accommodations for victims, including changes to work schedules, modified job duties, and physical workplace changes, unless the accommodation would cause undue hardship.
RCW 49.44.240, originally enacted as SB 5123 (effective January 1, 2024), prohibits employers from making hiring decisions based on an applicant's off-the-job, off-premises cannabis use, or based on a pre-employment drug screen that detects nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites.
The law preserves several employer rights:
Washington remains the country's only state where pre-employment cannabis-metabolite testing is broadly disallowed for non-safety-sensitive hiring.
Chapter 49.94 RCW, the Washington Fair Chance Act, regulates how and when employers may consider an applicant's criminal history. The original 2018 statute prohibited criminal-history questions on initial job applications. HB 1747, signed in 2025, restructured the framework around a conditional offer of employment.
Under HB 1747, employers may not inquire about or obtain information regarding an applicant's criminal record until after extending a conditional offer of employment.
Beyond the conditional-offer rule, employers may not:
A "legitimate business reason" requires the employer to consider the seriousness of the conduct, the time elapsed, and the relationship between the conduct and the job. The Washington Attorney General enforces the Fair Chance Act, with penalties starting at $750 per violation and escalating for repeat offenses. The background investigation overview covers the legitimate-business-reason analysis in more depth.
Where an employer uses a third-party consumer reporting agency to perform a background check, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act applies on top of the Fair Chance Act. Standalone disclosure, written authorization, pre-adverse action notice with copy of the report, and final adverse action notice are all required.
Washington uses a six-part test for independent contractor status, administered by L&I primarily through the workers' compensation framework but also for unemployment, wage and hour, and minimum wage analysis. A worker must satisfy all six parts to be classified as an independent contractor exempt from coverage. Construction work adds a seventh requirement.
For construction work covered by RCW 18.27, RCW 18.106, or RCW 19.28, the contractor must hold a valid contractor registration or specialty license. A contractor without that registration cannot be classified as independent regardless of how the other six parts are satisfied.
A contractor reclassified as an employee triggers a full-stack obligation: workers' compensation, PFML, WA Cares, paid sick leave, minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, and WLAD coverage all attach. Back-pay exposure runs three years for wage claims, six years for unemployment and workers' compensation premiums. The 13 most common reasons employees sue tracks misclassification near the top of the list for Washington.
Washington's six-part test is generally stricter than the federal "economic reality" test, but less rigid than California's ABC test. A worker who fails federal classification often fails Washington classification too.
Chapter 49.17 RCW, the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA), establishes Washington's state-plan OSHA program. L&I administers WISHA through its Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). Washington is one of 27 states that operates its own OSHA-approved program.
Every covered Washington employer must:
Several WISHA standards run beyond federal OSHA:
DOSH penalties track federal OSHA categories but with Washington's own indexing. Serious violations top out around $16,000 per violation. Willful or repeat violations can exceed $160,000 per violation. Failure-to-abate citations carry per-day penalties. The 10 most common OSHA violations walks through the standards that surface most often in DOSH inspections.
Washington's mini-WARN, the Securing Timely Notification and Benefits for Laid-off Employees Act (the STABLE Act, Chapter 50.110 RCW), requires employers with 50 or more full-time employees in Washington to provide 60 calendar days' advance written notice of business closings and mass layoffs.
Notice must be sent to:
Effective March 17, 2026, ESB 6106 made two structural changes:
Failure to give STABLE Act notice exposes the employer to back pay and benefits for each affected employee for the period of the violation, up to 60 days. HB 2264, effective for layoffs on or after June 14, 2026, expanded unemployment eligibility to cover employees who voluntarily participate in an employer-initiated layoff, treating those volunteers as separated through no fault of their own.
Washington's mini-WARN sits on top of the federal WARN Act for employers crossing both thresholds. Multistate layoffs need to be analyzed under the federal floor and each applicable state's mini-WARN regime. The reduction in force compliance overview walks through the standard checklist for layered WARN notice, and the 7 essential tasks for managing employee relations cases covers how to handle the case volume that typically follows a Washington workforce reduction.
SHB 1308, signed in May 2025 and effective July 27, 2025, rewrote RCW 49.12.240 and added RCW 49.12.250 governing personnel file access.
Under the new definition, a personnel file includes job applications, performance evaluations, disciplinary records, leave records, payroll records, and employment agreements.
Employers must provide a complete copy of the personnel file within 21 calendar days of a written request, at no cost. A "former employee" includes someone who separated within three years of the request.
Statutory damages apply on a graduated scale:
A separated employee may also request a written statement of the reasons for the discharge. The employer must furnish a complete and accurate statement. The ethical termination playbook covers the documentation discipline that holds up under a Washington personnel-file demand.
Workplace harassment in Washington is prohibited by WLAD across every protected class. Federal Title VII overlays the same protections at 15 employees and above. The five warning signs of a hostile work environment covers the patterns that frontline managers most commonly miss before a formal complaint surfaces.
RCW 49.60.515 requires hotel, motel, retail, security, and property-services employers to adopt sexual harassment and assault policies, train their workforce, and supply panic buttons to workers who spend most of their time alone. The framework applies regardless of employer size in covered industries.
For hotels and motels with 60 or more rooms, compliance has been required since January 1, 2020. All other covered businesses had to comply by January 1, 2021. The EEOC harassment definitions and the quid pro quo harassment guide walk through the policy categories that show up in enforcement.
Outside the isolated-worker industries, Washington does not yet require statewide harassment training for all employers. Federal Title VII case law and the Washington State Human Rights Commission still treat training, policy, and prompt investigation as elements of a meaningful harassment defense, mirroring the federal Faragher/Ellerth framework. The 11 categories of workplace harassment covers the patterns that show up most often across investigations, and the hostile work environment guide walks through how Washington courts apply the standard.
A meaningful harassment defense in Washington turns on what the employer did once it knew or should have known. That puts pressure on intake, triage, and investigation discipline rather than on the reporting channel itself. The workplace investigation playbook and the structured interview question set cover the documentation standards that hold up against agency review, and the 12 elements of a workplace investigation report lays out the reporting structure WSHRC and L&I investigators expect.
Senate Bill 5104, effective July 1, 2025, prohibits employers from using a worker's real or perceived immigration status to threaten or coerce them out of exercising rights related to wages, conditions of labor, or agricultural labor.
Washington draws a careful distinction. Retaliation happens after the employee raises an issue. Coercion under SSB 5104 happens before, deterring the employee from raising the issue at all. L&I investigates complaints under both regimes and can stack penalties when conduct hits both layers. The retaliation prevention checklist covers the workflow steps that hold up under both standards.
Civil penalties run per violation and L&I has authority to investigate without a complaint. Employers should review intake training so frontline managers understand that any reference to immigration status during a wage or safety conversation is independently actionable.
Washington uses universal vote-by-mail, which has changed how voting leave plays out in practice. Under RCW 49.28.120, employers must arrange working hours on primary or election day so that each employee has a reasonable time of up to two hours during polls-open to vote, but the obligation applies only when there is insufficient time to secure an absentee ballot. Because Washington elections are conducted entirely by mail, the practical result is that voting leave rarely needs to be granted on election day itself.
RCW 49.12.460 prohibits an employer from discharging or disciplining a volunteer firefighter, reserve officer, or civil air patrol member because of leave taken to respond to an alarm of fire or an emergency call. The statute applies regardless of whether the volunteer is paid for the response. A worker who believes they have been disciplined or fired in violation of the statute may file a complaint with the L&I director within 90 days.
Washington also recognizes:
For caregiving conversations more broadly, the employee caregiver advocacy guide walks through how a Washington-compliant caregiver policy connects to retention.
Chapter 49.48 RCW governs payment of wages on separation. Final wages are due on the next regularly scheduled payday after the last day of employment. Washington does not require immediate payment on the day of termination the way California does.
Final-paycheck deductions are tightly limited under WAC 296-126-025. Employers cannot deduct wages from the final paycheck for incidents that occurred in previous pay periods. Allowed deductions include legally required withholdings, deductions specifically agreed to in writing in advance, deductions to recover the cost of items that are the property of the employee, and certain narrow categories defined by WAC.
No deduction may reduce the employee's wages for the work performed below the state minimum wage in effect when the work was performed.
WAC 296-126-040 requires that each pay statement show:
Willful refusal to pay final wages exposes the employer to double damages under RCW 49.52.070 in addition to the unpaid wages, attorneys' fees, and interest. Wage complaints to L&I trigger a civil investigation, with administrative penalties layered on top of the private remedy.
WAC 296-126-092 sets the meal and rest break rules for non-exempt employees in Washington.
Effective January 1, 2026, hospitals must provide uninterrupted meal and rest breaks to employees engaged in direct patient care, with only two narrow exceptions: an unforeseeable emergent circumstance, or an unforeseeable clinical situation where the employee determines a patient could suffer a significant adverse effect from the worker leaving the bedside. Hospitals must track interruptions and provide makeup breaks.
Agricultural workers and certain commercial motor vehicle drivers operate under separate break rules. The commercial motor vehicle rules have been the subject of a federal preemption dispute, with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's preemption determination challenged and partly preserved on appeal.
Three primary state agencies enforce the Washington employment law framework, each with distinct jurisdiction:
L&I administers WISHA workplace safety, paid sick leave, minimum wage, overtime, exempt status, child labor, paid lactation, the Healthy Starts Act, the EPOA, the Fair Chance Act, the Domestic Violence Leave Act, and workers' compensation. L&I also enforces the non-compete framework's threshold-and-notice rules.
Wage complaints to L&I have a three-year statute of limitations under most provisions, with administrative investigation, mandatory employer response, and civil penalties available before the matter ever reaches court.
ESD administers PFML, WA Cares, unemployment insurance, the STABLE Act (mini-WARN), and worker training programs. Premium audits, eligibility decisions, and benefit appeals all run through ESD.
The WSHRC administratively enforces WLAD, investigating discrimination and harassment complaints, conducting conciliation, and issuing findings. Workers may also file directly in state court without exhausting WSHRC processes.
Filing deadlines vary by claim:
Federal claims under Title VII, ADA, ADEA, and the FLSA proceed in parallel under their own deadlines. Most workers in Washington dual-file with WSHRC and the EEOC under existing work-sharing agreements.
The 2025 Washington legislative session ran through April 27, 2025, with Governor Ferguson signing a substantial slate of employment bills. The most operationally significant changes for HR teams:
The 2026 legislative session, a 60-day short session that began January 12 and was scheduled to adjourn March 12, focused on technical amendments rather than major rewrites. ESB 6106 (mini-WARN privacy and tribal exclusion) and HB 2264 (unemployment for voluntary layoff participants) are the operationally meaningful 2026 enactments.
Several Washington local governments operate parallel employment ordinances that go beyond state law. The most active jurisdictions:
Seattle's Office of Labor Standards enforces a stack of city ordinances, including the Minimum Wage Ordinance (SMC 14.19), Paid Sick and Safe Time (SMC 14.16), Wage Theft Ordinance (SMC 14.20), Secure Scheduling Ordinance (SMC 14.22) for retail and food service, Domestic Workers Ordinance (SMC 14.23), Hotel Employees Health and Safety Initiative (SMC 14.25), and Independent Contractor Protections (SMC 14.34).
SeaTac applies its higher minimum wage to hospitality and transportation employees. Tukwila applies city-wide. Both ordinances run their own posted-wage and notice rules.
Each has adopted its own minimum wage above the state floor, with thresholds tied to employer size and gross revenue rather than industry. Local enforcement runs through the city or, in some cases, through Washington Wage Payment Collection.
Multi-site Washington employers should map each location to the highest applicable wage and hour rule and run a separate review of secure-scheduling, hotel-worker, and domestic-worker rules where they apply. Workforce management systems should encode the local rates as separate variables to avoid the most common compliance errors at the location level. A current employee handbook framework can also help, paired with a social media policy review that respects Washington's wage-discussion protections under RCW 49.58.040.
Washington recordkeeping rules layer on top of federal requirements. Common state retention periods:
When a charge or lawsuit is filed, the litigation hold extends every relevant retention period until the matter resolves.
Washington's framework is dense, layered, and updated annually. HR teams need infrastructure that captures every report, every accommodation request, every safety concern, and every retaliation flag with the documentation discipline state and federal agencies expect on audit.
AllVoices is an employee relations platform built for the cases Washington compliance turns into work:
For Washington employers running multistate operations, the platform handles the layered compliance picture: federal Title VII and FLSA at the floor, WLAD and Washington wage law on top, and Seattle, SeaTac, Tukwila, Renton, Bellingham, or other local ordinances stacked on top of those. The 2024 HR case management comparison covers how the platform fits inside an HR stack at different stages of company growth.
The state minimum wage is $17.13 per hour effective January 1, 2026. Workers aged 14 or 15 may be paid 85% of that rate, or $14.56 per hour. Cities including Seattle ($21.30), Tukwila ($21.65), Renton ($21.57 for large employers), SeaTac ($20.74 for hospitality and transportation), and Bellingham ($19.13) set higher local rates that override the state floor at those locations.
The 2026 white-collar exempt salary threshold is $1,541.70 per week, or $80,168.40 per year, applied to all employer sizes. The threshold equals 2.25 times the state minimum wage. Computer professionals can alternatively qualify at 3.5 times the state minimum, or $59.96 per hour. Both numbers are well above the federal FLSA standard of $35,568, so a worker can be exempt under federal law and still owed Washington overtime.
The 2026 PFML premium rate is 1.13% of wages, up from 0.92% in 2025. Employees pay 71.43% of the total premium and employers with 50 or more employees pay the remaining 28.57%. Smaller employers may withhold the employee share without paying their own portion. Premiums apply to wages up to the Social Security wage base of $184,500 for 2026. The maximum weekly benefit is $1,647 for new claims filed in 2026.
The $36,500 lifetime long-term care benefit becomes claimable beginning July 2026 for eligible workers who meet the vesting and care-need criteria. Premiums of 0.58% of gross wages, with no wage cap, have been collected through payroll deduction since July 2023 and continue at the same rate in 2026.
Yes, but only against high earners and only with specific procedural compliance. Under RCW 49.62, a non-compete is void and unenforceable unless an employee earns more than $126,858.83 annually (2026 threshold) or an independent contractor earns more than $317,147.09. Non-competes also require pre-acceptance written disclosure, additional consideration if signed after employment begins, and layoff-pay equivalent to base salary if a laid-off employee is held to the covenant. Choice-of-law and choice-of-forum provisions purporting to apply non-Washington law to Washington-based workers are void.
Yes. Under RCW 49.58.110, employers with 15 or more employees must include a wage scale or salary range plus a description of all benefits and compensation in every job posting. SSB 5408 (effective July 27, 2025) permitted a fixed-wage listing where only one amount is offered and created a 5-business-day cure window after written notice through July 27, 2027. Penalties run $5,000 per violation plus actual damages and a private right of action.
For employers with 15 or more employees, the conditional-offer rule under HB 1747 takes effect July 1, 2026. For employers with fewer than 15 employees, the rule takes effect January 1, 2027. After those dates, employers may not inquire about an applicant's criminal record or run a criminal background check until after extending a conditional offer of employment.
Generally no, with exceptions. RCW 49.44.240 prohibits initial-hire decisions based on off-the-job, off-premises cannabis use, and prohibits reliance on pre-employment drug tests that screen for nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites. Employers may still test for psychoactive impairment on duty, may run drug tests for federal background investigation positions, security clearance roles, certain public safety positions, and identified safety-sensitive roles, and may comply with federal contractor or DOT-mandated programs.
Washington's framework outpaces federal employment law on nearly every measure that affects day-to-day HR work. The 2026 priorities for HR teams operating in Washington:
For the federal floor that Washington layers on top of, and for state-by-state detail on how rules in other jurisdictions compare, the California, New York, and federal compliance pillars are the right next stops, and a quick HR case management primer covers how an employee relations platform carries the documentation load Washington compliance generates.
Stay up to date on Employee Relations news
Sign up to our newsletter