In this episode of Reimagining Company Culture, we spoke with Alaina (Roche) Kwasizur, General Counsel of AMPAC and Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer at Sonos. Alaina has more than fifteen years of experience sitting at the intersection of legal, compliance, and culture, and she brings a rare dual lens to the question of how to keep engagement alive past the launch moment of a new initiative.
Her argument is unflashy. Most employee engagement programs die not because employees disengaged, but because leaders moved on to the next deliverable. Sustaining engagement is a discipline, and it sits closer to operating rigor than to campaign design.
Why Engagement Decays Without a Sustaining Plan
Employees are not the problem when engagement fades. Most programs are launched with energy and then left to run on autopilot, with no owner refreshing content, no manager reinforcing behavior, and no data driving course correction. After two or three quarters, the program that started as a strategic priority becomes another item on the intranet.
Gallup's State of the Global Workplace reports US engagement at an 11-year low, and 70 percent of the variance in team engagement ties back to the manager. That means sustaining engagement is really about sustaining manager capability. A polished launch with no manager support produces a short-term lift and a long-term fade.
The implication for HR leaders is that the real engagement work starts after the launch, not before it. The post-launch plan, including manager briefings, refresh cycles, and integration into existing performance rhythms, is where the durable lift comes from.
Alaina's dual legal and culture seat makes another point worth sitting with. Compliance and engagement are not adversaries, even though they often feel that way inside a company. Well-designed engagement programs make compliance work easier because they raise the base level of trust. Well-designed compliance programs protect engagement because they remove the conditions that make people feel unsafe.
Treating the two functions as allies changes the design of both. Training becomes more useful, case resolution becomes less adversarial, and the overall culture gets the benefit of consistent signals from both seats.
What Sustained Engagement Requires From the Operating Model
What is the most common reason engagement initiatives fade?
Ownership drifts. A VP sponsors the launch, moves on to another priority, and the program is handed to someone without the authority to keep it alive. Assigning a named long-term owner with protected time is the single biggest predictor of whether a program survives its second year.
How often should engagement programs refresh?
Substantive refreshes every twelve months. Lighter touch updates every quarter. Programs that never refresh start to feel stale within eighteen months, and the signal employees take from the staleness is that leadership stopped caring.
Another engagement trap is confusing enthusiasm with participation. Launch enthusiasm is real, but it is not durable. Participation, by contrast, accumulates over time and produces outcomes regardless of mood. A program with boring, reliable participation is almost always healthier than a program with enthusiastic spikes and steep declines.
That is why sustained programs look different in their second year. The flash is gone. The habit has set in. The measurement reflects real change rather than novelty, and the data can support the next round of investment with more confidence.
What Actually Works for Sustaining Engagement
Principle 1: Tie the program to an existing operating rhythm
Programs die when they exist outside the standard cadence. Programs endure when they are part of monthly team meetings, quarterly business reviews, and annual calibration. The discipline is integration, not novelty.
Principle 2: Build manager capability as the primary lever
Managers carry engagement. Investing in manager coaching, peer learning cohorts, and short just-in-time guidance pays back more than a major refresh of a central program. Reinforce it with a steady read on team health through lightweight pulse surveys.
Principle 3: Report what changed, not just what launched
Employees stop engaging with programs that report activity without outcomes. Share the delta: what moved, what did not, what you are trying next. Transparency sustains trust.
Where Employee Relations Fits
Engagement also lives in the case work. When retention declines for a specific team, case themes usually tell you what the survey missed. Strong HR case management and a focused employee engagement operating model make the connection between case patterns and engagement trends explicit.
ER drill-down: reading engagement from case volume
Track the ratio of cases opened per hundred employees by team, by quarter. Rising case rates with flat or declining engagement scores point to a culture problem that a new program will not solve. Falling case rates with rising engagement are a good sign, but watch for survey fatigue that makes employees stop reporting altogether.
ER data is also useful for diagnosing which manager changes are working. A manager transition that is followed by a sustained drop in case rates and a lift in engagement scores is a good reference point for future selection decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions About Sustaining Engagement
How long does it take for a new engagement program to show durable impact?
Typically two to four quarters. Anything faster is usually a launch effect that will fade. Anything slower usually signals an implementation issue rather than a program issue.
Is there a right frequency for engagement surveys?
Annual for a comprehensive measure, quarterly for pulse items, monthly or weekly only when something specific requires tracking. Over-measuring erodes the signal and burns employee patience.
Should engagement work report into HR or the CEO office?
HR usually. But the CEO needs to own the outcomes in business reviews, because the accountability has to sit where decisions are actually made.
What is the fastest way to kill engagement?
Collect feedback and do nothing visible with it. Employees who watch the same concerns raised every cycle without response will stop responding. Silence is the signal.
Is engagement different from belonging?
Related but distinct. Engagement is about whether the work is meaningful and supported. Belonging is about whether the person feels welcomed and respected. You can be engaged and not feel you belong, and vice versa. Both need their own measurement and their own interventions.
Finally, sustained engagement is an attractive recruiting story. Candidates can tell whether an engagement program is alive or ceremonial within a few conversations, and the teams that keep the work alive see it show up in their offer acceptance rates, their Glassdoor scores, and their employer brand. That is a secondary payoff on top of the retention and performance gains.
Supporting data from Deloitte's research on employee engagement strategies shows that sustained engagement programs outperform campaign-style programs across retention, productivity, and customer-facing metrics. The sustaining work is where the returns compound.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Alaina's experience across legal, compliance, and culture points to a lesson many HR leaders learn the hard way. Engagement work is not an event. It is an operating rhythm, and the organizations that treat it that way produce durable results. The organizations that treat engagement as a campaign usually find themselves relaunching the same program every eighteen months.
That is expensive, and it is demoralizing for the HR team that has to keep running the relaunch. A sustained engagement practice is boring, disciplined, and effective. It requires a named owner, a cadence, manager capability, and honest reporting. Without those, even the best-designed program eventually disappears into the intranet.
The best engagement work looks slow from the outside. It is the steady accumulation of small, reinforced habits across a thousand managers. That is what moves the score, and more importantly, that is what moves the experience.
See how AllVoices helps People teams sustain engagement with connected case data and pulse insights.
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)