.avif)
The phrase "occupassion" comes up only with Nichole Barnes Marshall, Global Head of Inclusion and Diversity at Pinterest. Her invented word captures the intersection of occupation and passion that the best DEIB work tries to enable. The conversation on Reimagining Company Culture is a useful contrast to the standard DEIB pitch. Most companies talk about belonging and inclusion in abstract terms; Nichole talks about the operational work of embedding the disciplines into existing business processes.
Nichole's two decades at L Brands, Aon, IBM, and Pinterest have produced a deeply pragmatic view. DEIB cannot be a separate function fighting for resources; it has to be embedded in how decisions get made across the company. The embedded version compounds. The standalone version dissolves under budget pressure.
What "Embedding DEIB" Actually Means in Practice
Embedding is structural. Hiring panels with diversity built into the rubric. Promotion calibrations with demographic analysis as a default. Comp-band reviews that include equity audits. Each piece of the operating cadence has DEIB embedded rather than added on top.
McKinsey research on diversity, equity, and inclusion consistently shows that companies with strong inclusion practices outperform peers, and the strongest correlations come from embedded DEIB rather than standalone programs. The data follows the structure.
Helping Employees Find Occupassion at Work
Nichole's framing of occupassion is the human-side argument for DEIB. People who can be themselves at work, do the work that uses their strengths, and feel connected to the mission are more productive and stay longer. The companies that produce occupassion at scale share a few traits.
They invest in employee engagement as an operating discipline. They take talent management seriously across career stages. They build DEI infrastructure that supports rather than constrains individual identity at work.
What Are the Most Common Mistakes Companies Make with DEIB?
Treating DEIB as a marketing function. Setting numerical goals without changing the systems. Funding events without funding structural change. Each pattern produces visible activity without measurable outcomes.
How Do You Measure DEIB Embedding vs. DEIB Activity?
Activity metrics: events held, training completion rates, ERG attendance. Embedding metrics: promotion rate by demographic, retention by demographic, comp equity by level, ER pattern data. Activity metrics are easy and misleading. Embedding metrics are harder and useful.
Working at Scale Across L Brands, Aon, IBM, and Pinterest
The cross-industry experience matters. DEIB at a retail company looks different than DEIB at a consulting firm or a tech platform. The embedded version travels because it is grounded in operational disciplines that exist everywhere: hiring, promotion, compensation, performance management, and case handling.
The non-embedded version does not travel. Customized programs that worked at one company often fail at the next because the program was bolted on rather than built in.
What Actually Works for Embedded DEIB
Build DEIB Into Hiring Rubrics
Hiring panels with structured rubrics produce less biased outcomes than unstructured conversations. Structured interviews are the cheapest, highest-impact intervention available.
Include Demographic Analysis in Calibration
Calibration sessions that surface demographic patterns by default produce different outcomes than sessions that do not. The pattern recognition is the work; the reporting is the audit trail.
Use ER Patterns as a DEIB Diagnostic
ER cases reveal the gap between commitment and culture. A DEI hotline creates a path for the cases that the formal HR channel will not capture.
Where Employee Relations Fits
ER is the operating layer that catches DEIB failures in real time. A purpose-built case management platform handles those cases without forcing the team to choose between speed and care.
How AI Helps DEIB Functions
Vera, the AllVoices AI co-pilot, surfaces patterns across cases that human investigators would miss case by case. The patterns inform the next quarter's DEIB priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions About Embedded DEIB
Should DEIB sit inside HR or as a separate function?
Both structures can work. The structure matters less than whether the operating cadence has DEIB embedded across all people processes.
What is the right cadence for refreshing the DEIB strategy?
Annual review with a multi-year plan. More often is reactive; less often is calcification.
How do you handle a DEIB initiative that is meeting internal resistance?
Frame the case in operational and outcome terms rather than values terms. The companies that win the case do so with retention data, business outcomes, and case-pattern evidence rather than aspiration.
What is the role of an executive sponsor for DEIB work?
Unblock funding, vouch in executive committee, and shield the function from political pressure. A sponsor who only attends events is a figurehead.
How does occupassion translate to retention?
Employees who feel that work uses their strengths and aligns with their values stay longer and produce more. The retention curve diverges from peers within two to three years of consistent investment.
How Pinterest, IBM, and L Brands Each Embed Differently
The cross-company experience produces useful contrast. Each environment has different operational disciplines, but the embedded version of DEIB looks structurally similar. Hiring rubrics tied to representation. Calibration sessions with demographic analysis. Comp reviews with equity audits. Sponsorship goals tied to manager performance. The execution adapts; the structure is consistent.
Companies that have not embedded DEIB tend to repeat the same pattern: an annual program refresh, an executive announcement, a temporary spike in activity, and a return to baseline. Companies that have embedded the work see steady, compounding outcomes that survive leadership transitions. The structural version is the durable version.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Nichole's framing of embedding as the operational discipline is the right altitude. The companies that produce sustained DEIB outcomes do not lift programs from one place to another; they embed DEIB into every operational decision the company makes. The embedded version compounds; the standalone version dissolves.
EEOC data on workplace sexual harassment shows that 90% of harassment cases never go through formal channels, which means the data the company sees is a fraction of what is happening. The DEIB function that operates without an embedded ER infrastructure misses the patterns that actually matter.
The economic case is also compelling. Embedded DEIB programs produce retention numbers that diverge from peers within three to four years. The compounding savings on recruiting cost, ramp time, and lost institutional knowledge typically pay for the program many times over. Companies that have run the math invest accordingly. The ones that have not tend to underfund DEIB out of habit rather than analysis.
Pinterest's approach to work behavior standards across globally distributed teams reinforces the lesson. Embedded standards survive leadership transitions and operating model changes. Standalone programs do not.
The compounding effect of these operational disciplines shows up in the data over multi-year horizons. Companies that have built the infrastructure tend to see improving retention, faster issue resolution, and steadier engagement scores year over year. The investment is operational rather than dramatic, but the cumulative outcome is significant for any people team measuring real business impact.
The pattern holds across mid-market and enterprise contexts. Mid-market companies that adopt the operational disciplines early build a structural advantage that scales with them. Enterprise companies that retrofit the disciplines into existing operating models see the benefits more slowly but consistently. Either way, the work is operational rather than aspirational, and the leaders who treat it that way produce the outcomes the strategy promised.
.png)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)