.avif)
Financial services has produced more DEI announcements per quarter than most industries and somewhat fewer outcome shifts. Ron Taylor, Executive Vice President and Head of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Natixis Investment Managers, has spent two decades trying to close the gap. His conversation on Reimagining Company Culture is a working DEI leader's view of what produces real outcome change in financial services rather than another announcement cycle.
Ron's role at Natixis includes supporting the firm's affiliates in the region on their own DEI work. The structural variation across affiliates produces a useful test bed: what works in one affiliate, why it works, and what has to be adapted to travel. The lessons that hold up across affiliates tend to be the operational ones.
Why Financial Services DEI Underdelivers
The pattern repeats across firms. Public commitments rise. Activity climbs. Three years later, representation at director-and-above has barely moved. The gap between announcement and outcome is what Ron's work tries to close.
McKinsey research on diversity, equity, and inclusion on diversity and financial outperformance is the most-cited stat in financial-services DEI for a reason. The financial case is settled. The operational gap is what is left, and it tends to be larger in financial services than in many adjacent industries.
Building Inclusion at Scale Across Investment Affiliates
Ron's framing is that inclusion at scale requires a small set of operating principles that travel and a larger set of execution choices that adapt. Financial services HR teams tend to do better with the principles-and-adaptation model than with imported playbooks.
The infrastructure has to support both. DEI programs that travel across affiliates tend to compound. Compliance partnerships tend to be embedded in financial services in ways they are not in tech, which is both a constraint and an asset.
What Are the Specific Challenges of Financial Services DEI?
Long-tenured leadership benches. Relationship-driven business models that favor existing networks. Compliance environments that reward conservatism. Each is a structural feature; none is unchangeable.
How Do You Move Outcomes Inside a Conservative Industry?
Tie outcomes to risk, talent pipeline, and regulatory standing. The values argument is true and incomplete. The operational case wins funding and attention.
Partnering With Affiliates Without Imposing
Ron's work supporting affiliates produces a particular discipline: provide the principles, the operating tools, and the data infrastructure, and let local leaders adapt the execution. The companies that try to impose central programs across affiliates produce friction; the ones that provide infrastructure and partnership produce traction.
What Actually Works for Financial Services DEI
Tie DEI Outcomes to Operating Risk
Operating risk is the language financial services speaks. Talent retention, regulatory standing, and reputational risk all map cleanly to DEI work. The cases that win are the ones in operating-risk language.
Build Sponsorship Programs With Measurable Advancement Goals
Sponsorship outperforms mentorship for advancement outcomes. Companies that distinguish the two and invest in sponsorship see different promotion rates.
Use Anonymous Channels for the Cases the Industry Hides
Financial services has a particular history of issues going underreported. Anonymous reporting matters disproportionately. A whistleblower hotline is a specific tool the industry needs.
Where Employee Relations Fits
ER catches the cases that DEI work cannot prevent. In financial services, the cases often have legal and regulatory weight beyond the people outcomes. A purpose-built case management platform handles both dimensions without forcing the team to choose.
How AI Helps Financial Services HR Functions
Vera, the AllVoices AI co-pilot, surfaces patterns and drafts case responses while preserving the audit trail that financial services compliance requires.
Frequently Asked Questions About Financial Services DEI
What is the right reporting cadence for DEI in financial services?
Quarterly internally with annual public reporting is becoming standard. The cadence drives the accountability.
How do you handle DEI outcomes alongside compliance requirements?
Treat compliance as a partner, not an obstacle. The compliance team has structural authority to shape outcomes that the DEI function does not have on its own.
What works in financial services that does not work in tech?
Long-horizon investment. Tenure-based promotion structures. Apprenticeship models. Each is a strength when used deliberately.
How does sponsorship work in financial services?
It works particularly well because the industry already operates on relationship-based career advancement. The discipline is to make the sponsorship more deliberate and more equitably distributed.
How do you measure DEI progress in a regulated industry?
Standard outcome metrics by demographic, plus regulatory standing and reputational data. The combination produces a picture that single metrics would miss.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Ron's framing of DEI as an operational outcome discipline rather than an announcement discipline is the right altitude. Financial services has been long on announcements and short on outcomes. The companies that close the gap tend to share a discipline of treating DEI work as risk and talent strategy rather than corporate-affairs strategy.
EEOC data on workplace sexual harassment continues to show that the formal cases visible to most companies are a fraction of what is happening, and the under-reporting tends to be more severe in industries with hierarchical, relationship-based career advancement. Financial services is one of those industries.
How These Disciplines Hold Up at Different Company Sizes
The operational disciplines described here scale differently across organization sizes. Mid-market companies tend to feel the pressure first because they are growing past the informal practices that worked at smaller scale. Enterprise companies feel the pressure differently: their existing infrastructure is solid, but it can ossify around legacy patterns that no longer serve a modern workforce. Both face the same underlying challenge of balancing structure with humanity.
The pattern that holds across sizes is that the work is operational rather than aspirational. Companies that treat the people function as a real operating discipline produce different retention, engagement, and case-resolution outcomes than companies that treat it as a soft function. Talent management done with operational rigor produces compounding returns that announcement-driven approaches never match.
The compounding effect of consistent operational discipline shows up in the data over multi-year horizons. Companies that have built the infrastructure tend to see improving retention, faster issue resolution, and steadier engagement scores year over year. The investment is unglamorous; the cumulative outcome is significant for any people team measuring real business impact.
The patterns that travel across companies share a common feature: they treat the work as a multi-year operational discipline rather than a quarterly campaign. Companies that have done this consistently produce retention curves that diverge from peer-group averages within three to four years. The investment is significant, the returns are durable, and the cost of skipping the work is paid in attrition, lost institutional knowledge, and the eventual scramble to rebuild what could have been preserved with consistent attention.
The discipline also produces second-order effects that compound. ER cases tend to drop in volume as upstream interventions take hold. Engagement scores stabilize across business units that previously diverged. Internal mobility broadens because the people who would have left now stay long enough to advance. Each second-order effect feeds back into the first-order numbers, which is why the operational version of this work compounds while the announcement version dissipates.
The lessons described here also carry into adjacent industries and contexts. Mid-market firms experiencing rapid growth, enterprise organizations rebuilding their operating models, and globally distributed teams adapting to new regulatory environments all benefit from the same operational disciplines. The execution varies by context; the underlying principle holds across them.
.png)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)