.avif)
Most culture work tries to add new behaviors to a foundation that is still holding the old ones. That is why the work plateaus. The new programming runs on top of the same operating model, and the operating model is what generated the original problem. On this episode of Reimagining Company Culture, Julia Satov walks through the discipline of deconstructing what is not working and reconstructing the culture around psychological safety and inclusive practice.
Julia has spent her career inside companies that hit a culture ceiling and had to rebuild from the foundation up. The pattern she describes is common. The new programs land, the engagement scores tick up, and then the same issues come back two years later because the load-bearing systems were never touched. The reconstruction approach starts with the operating model and lets the programming follow.
Here is how a deconstruction-and-reconstruction approach to culture work runs and what it produces over a multi-year cycle.
Why Add-On Culture Work Plateaus
Culture programming that sits on top of an unchanged operating model runs into the same gravity every time. Decisions still get made the same way. Performance still gets reviewed the same way. Promotions still happen the same way. According to McKinsey research on psychological safety, only 26% of leaders create psychological safety for their teams, which is exactly the kind of operating-model number that programming alone cannot move.
The deconstruction approach starts by naming the systems that are producing the cultural pattern. Performance review structure. Compensation philosophy. Manager scorecards. Investigation and ER process. Each of those is a load-bearing system. Most cultures plateau because the work happens around the systems instead of inside them.
How HR Teams Deconstruct and Rebuild Culture
What does deconstruction actually look like in HR practice?
It looks like an honest audit of the systems producing the cultural pattern. Hiring, performance, promotion, ER, and listening processes all get inventoried. Each one gets scored on whether it generates the behavior the company says it values or contradicts it. The contradictions are the work. organizational culture as a system is the layer where this happens.
What does reconstruction look like once the deconstruction is done?
Reconstruction is structural, not programmatic. Pay band changes. Performance rubric changes. Promotion criteria changes. Manager scorecard changes. ER process changes. Each one shifts the operating model in a small, durable way. The programming layer can come back later. The structural layer has to come first.
What Actually Works in Deconstruction and Reconstruction
Start with the systems, not the slogans
The fastest way to lose credibility on culture work is to launch new programming before fixing the underlying systems. Employees notice. Start with performance, compensation, and ER. Move to programming once those three are running cleanly.
Build psychological safety as an operational outcome
psychological safety at work is not a program. It is the byproduct of how decisions get made. The operating model has to allow for disagreement, dissent, and reporting without consequence. The inputs to that outcome are structural.
Hold the multi-year horizon
Reconstruction takes years. The companies that succeed are the ones whose leaders hold the timeline through pressure to show short-term results. The companies that fail rotate to a new program every twelve months and never compound.
The pattern the guest describes on this episode lines up with broader research. The peer-reviewed study on supervisor active-empathetic listening reinforces the operating-model lens and gives HR leaders a useful reference for grounding the conversation in numbers their CEOs and CFOs already trust. It also surfaces the same gap between stated culture priorities and how People work actually runs inside most organizations.
Where Employee Relations Fits
Reconstruction work runs through ER. The ER process is where the operating model meets the hardest moments. If the ER process is broken, every other piece of the culture rebuild stays exposed. employee relations operations is the load-bearing function for any culture reconstruction.
the Vera AI co-pilot sits at the center of how AllVoices customers run that work. Intake, triage, investigation tracking, and pattern detection all live in one workflow. anonymous reporting tools keeps the channels open for the employees most likely to be silenced during the rebuild.
How does ER infrastructure support culture reconstruction?
Culture reconstruction generates more reports as employees test whether the new operating model holds. AllVoices gives ER teams the throughput to handle the increase, the reporting to surface patterns, and the documentation to demonstrate the consistency of the new process. The infrastructure is what makes the rebuild visible.
The pattern across AllVoices customers is consistent. ER teams that operate on a single workflow handle more cases at higher quality with the same headcount. The structured intake reduces the time between an employee raising a concern and the case being triaged. The case management layer keeps the documentation tight so investigations hold up to legal and audit review. The reporting layer surfaces the patterns leadership needs to act on structural issues rather than handling each case in isolation. That combination is what lets People teams treat ER as a strategic function rather than a reactive one.
Frequently Asked Questions About Reconstructing Workplace Culture
What does it mean to deconstruct workplace culture?
It means auditing the operating systems producing the current cultural pattern and naming the ones that contradict the values the company says it holds. Hiring, performance, promotion, and ER processes are usually where the contradictions live.
How is reconstruction different from launching new culture programs?
Reconstruction changes the operating model. Programming runs on top of it. Most companies launch programs without changing the systems, which is why the programs plateau.
How long does culture reconstruction take?
Multi-year. Pay structure, performance rubrics, and ER process changes all take time to land and produce results. The companies that succeed hold the horizon.
How does psychological safety connect to reconstruction work?
Psychological safety is the byproduct of an operating model that allows dissent, disagreement, and honest reporting without consequence. Reconstructing the operating model is what produces it. Programming alone does not.
What role does ER work play in culture reconstruction?
ER is the load-bearing function. The way the company handles complaints, investigations, and policy disputes is the test the rest of the rebuild relies on. A clean ER process is the prerequisite.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Culture reconstruction is structural, slow, and durable. Programming is fast and fragile. The companies that build cultures that hold up are the ones whose leaders are willing to do the unglamorous work on the operating model first. Julia's framing in the episode is a useful reminder of why.
If your engagement scores have plateaued or your culture work feels like it is running in place, the move is to audit the systems before launching the next program. The operating model is where the gravity lives.
For HR leaders working through this from a broader operations angle, the AllVoices reference on inclusion practices covers the adjacent ground in more depth. It is a useful companion to the conversation in this episode.
The conversation in this episode underlines a pattern AllVoices has seen across hundreds of People teams. Programming alone does not move the operating model. The structural work, the manager development, the ER infrastructure, and the listening cycles that close visibly are what produce the outcomes the company can actually measure. That is the work the function will be evaluated on over the next several years, and the People leaders who do it well will keep earning bigger seats at the table. For HR teams looking to start, the move that pays off fastest is usually the operational one. Audit one process this quarter. Pick the structural change with the highest impact. Build the documentation around it. Close the loop with employees so they can see what changed and why. The compound effect of doing that consistently across a year is bigger than any single program initiative. The People teams that take this approach end up running cultures that hold up under stress and operating models that the rest of the C-suite trusts. That is the standard the function is moving toward, and the AllVoices customer base is full of teams already getting there.
If you want to see how AllVoices supports the ER backbone of a culture rebuild, you can request a walkthrough of the platform. Book a tour of AllVoices.
.png)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)