When we sat down with Noelle Peart, Head of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Exos, the conversation pulled back to one phrase she returned to over and over. Greatness is a team sport. Noelle had spent fourteen years at Best Buy in operations and HR before stepping into DEI leadership, helping build the I.D.O.L. inclusion committee and co-championing the Black employee resource group. Her view of DEI was operational, not aspirational. Build the team, build the metrics, and protect the practitioners.
That last point hit hardest. Noelle was direct about the emotional labor DEI leaders absorb, and the way that load gets ignored in most strategy documents. She made a case for treating DEI work like any other discipline that depends on durable individuals, with budget, sponsorship, and real lines of authority. Years later, the data has only sharpened her argument.
Why DEI Strategy Has to Survive Leadership Turnover
The single biggest threat to DEI work is not an external backlash. It is internal turnover. When a chief diversity officer leaves and the program had no operating model behind them, the work collapses inside a quarter. The companies still making progress are the ones that wired DEI into the operating cadence rather than the office of one person.
The financial case has not weakened. McKinsey's Diversity Wins research still shows companies in the top quartile for executive team gender diversity are 25 percent more likely to outperform on profitability. The companies running the most durable programs are the ones treating DEI as a business discipline, not a one-person mandate.
What Greatness as a Team Sport Looks Like in Practice
How Do You Spread Ownership Beyond the DEI Office?
Noelle's model at Exos paired the central DEI function with senior business sponsors, an active employee resource group ecosystem, and a People Operations partnership that handled execution. The DEI office set strategy. Sponsors held accountability. ERGs delivered programming. People Ops ran the systems. Spread ownership this way and the program survives any one departure.
What Does It Take to Protect DEI Practitioners From Burnout?
Most DEI leaders carry an invisible second job that includes peer counseling, identity-based conflict mediation, and the constant emotional weight of being the only person in the room with a name like theirs. The teams getting this right structure that load into the role description, fund external coaching, and build a clear escalation path to employee relations for cases that should never sit on the DEI lead's desk in the first place.
What Actually Works for Building Inclusion
Build Inclusion Into the Manager Operating Model
Inclusion is mostly a function of what managers do every week, not what the DEI office publishes every quarter. Train managers on running inclusive meetings, distributing high-visibility work, and giving feedback across difference. Then measure the manager scores by demographic group. The companies seeing real movement on inclusion have made the manager the unit of change.
Treat Pay and Promotion Equity as Engineering Problems
Equity shows up in three places. Pay, promotion, and access. Audit pay annually with an outside firm. Track promotion velocity by demographic. Watch who gets stretch assignments and who gets stuck. The McKinsey Women in the Workplace report found that for every 100 men promoted to manager, only 81 women are. Until that broken rung is fixed, every other DEI program is downstream of a structural bias.
Fund ERGs Like You Mean It
Employee resource groups without budgets are book clubs. ERGs with real budgets, executive sponsors, and a measurable charter are some of the most cost-effective talent and culture investments a company can make. Exos used ERGs to drive recruiting, retention, and product feedback in parallel.
Operationalizing this matters because the DEI conversation is now so polarized that any program built only on intention will be challenged. Programs grounded in pay equity audits, promotion velocity data, manager scorecards, and connected ER signal hold up under scrutiny because the case for them is evidence, not values. The Chief People Officers still defending DEI work successfully are the ones who can put data on the table when their CEO or board pushes back.
Noelle was clear that the work also requires patience. Real change in promotion velocity by demographic shows up over multi-year windows, not in a single engagement survey. The discipline is to keep measuring through the volatility, fund ERGs and managers as the levers that compound, and refuse to let leadership turnover reset the program every two years.
Where Employee Relations Fits in DEI Strategy
Most companies separate DEI and employee relations. The strongest programs treat them as connected. ER is where the company's DEI commitments meet the hardest cases. A discrimination complaint, a microaggression that escalated, a manager whose feedback is harsher with one demographic group. If those cases get handled poorly, no public DEI commitment will compensate for the damage.
Data and insights from a connected case management system are what tell a Chief People Officer whether their inclusion strategy is producing real outcomes or only good intentions. Volume by category, time-to-resolution, location patterns, and manager-level signals all surface when ER cases run through one workflow. The DEI office and the ER team should be reading the same dashboard.
How Does Connected Case Management Change DEI Outcomes?
It changes outcomes by closing the gap between what the company says and what employees experience. Employee relations data shows whether the manager training landed, whether the promotion criteria are being applied consistently, and whether the speak-up culture is real. Inclusion that does not survive the case workflow is not inclusion.
Frequently Asked Questions About DEI Strategy
What is the difference between diversity, equity, and inclusion?
Diversity is who is in the room. Equity is whether the rules in the room are fair. Inclusion is whether everyone in the room can speak and be heard. Programs that conflate the three rarely produce results because each requires different interventions.
How do you measure whether a DEI program is working?
Three metrics matter most. Representation across promotion bands, pay equity audited by an external firm, and employee-reported inclusion broken down by demographic group. If those numbers move year over year, the program is working. If they do not, no number of trainings will compensate.
What is the biggest mistake companies make with ERGs?
Funding them with food and a logo. Real ERGs need executive sponsors, an annual charter, a measurable budget, and a clear path for the work they produce to inform business decisions. Without those, ERGs ask their members to do unpaid identity work for the company.
How do you protect DEI practitioners from emotional labor?
Structure the load into the role. Fund external coaching. Build a real escalation path so identity-based incidents go through ER and HR partners instead of landing on the DEI leader's desk. DEI and employee experience work best when each function plays its position.
How does AllVoices support DEI strategy?
By giving the company a structured intake for sensitive issues, a documented case workflow, and aggregate data the DEI office can use to spot pattern problems early. DEI programs are only as strong as the case data behind them.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Noelle's framing has only gotten more useful. DEI work is operational, not aspirational. It survives leadership change when ownership is distributed, ERGs are funded, manager behavior is measured, and the case workflow produces evidence the program is working. The companies treating DEI as a team sport are the ones still making real progress while others walk back commitments.
Greatness is a team sport. So is durable inclusion.
See how AllVoices gives DEI and employee relations leaders one connected workflow.
.png)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)