Guy Primus, CEO of Valence Community, has built a career across digital media, entertainment, and now a network for Black professionals. His view on team investment is shaped by two decades of work on closing the racial wealth gap and creating environments where BIPOC professionals can do their best work. The throughline is straightforward: companies that invest in their people, especially those historically underserved, get more from those people in return.
The wider issue is that team investment has been measured too narrowly. Salary, benefits, and training are part of the picture, but the harder pieces, equity in decision-making, anonymous channels for honest feedback, and inclusive practices that survive turnover, often get less attention. The cost shows up in lower engagement and higher attrition among the people who already had the least margin to spare.
HR leaders who want to do this work well have to design for it deliberately. Good intentions alone produce inconsistent results.
Why investing in BIPOC professionals is a performance issue
Inclusion is a performance variable. HBR's research on diverse teams and psychological safety makes the case directly; HBR's analysis of diverse teams and safety shows that diversity without inclusion produces underperformance. Both have to be present for the team to do its best work.
For HR leaders, that means investing in DEI infrastructure alongside listening systems, manager development, and clear accountability for inclusive behaviors. AllVoices' employee survey tool helps surface the gap between intention and experience.
That investment connects to equity in promotions, pay, and access to opportunity. Without those connections, DEI work risks becoming symbolic.
Building investment into the operating model
What does investing in BIPOC professionals look like in practice?
It starts with sponsorship, not just mentorship. Senior leaders who put their reputations behind the careers of BIPOC professionals open doors that mentorship alone cannot. Pair sponsorship with stretch assignments, transparent promotion criteria, and visible representation in leadership.
SHRM's coverage of recognizing and mitigating unconscious bias walks through the manager-level practices that make this real.
How do you make sure the investment actually reaches the people who need it?
Track who gets which opportunities. Promotions, stretch projects, executive sponsorship, and high-visibility assignments tell the truer story than headcount alone. Use people analytics to surface the patterns.
Pair that with anonymous channels so that employees can raise concerns about access without putting their names on it before they are ready. AllVoices' anonymous reporting tool creates that path.
What actually works
Treat sponsorship as a leadership accountability
Sponsorship works when senior leaders are measured on it. Track who they sponsor, how those careers progress, and whether their sponsorship reaches across difference. The data itself is the accountability.
Use mentoring and reverse mentoring programs as supports, not substitutes. Both serve different purposes; sponsorship opens doors, mentoring builds skill.
Make anonymous feedback core to the listening system
Some feedback never comes through a one-on-one, especially when power and identity are in play. Anonymous channels surface the concerns that employees do not yet feel safe raising directly. Treat the data as seriously as named feedback, and act on patterns visibly.
That visibility builds trust. Trust is what makes the named feedback flow.
Connect investment to wealth and outcomes
Compensation, equity grants, and clear paths to ownership-level roles are part of how companies invest in their teams. The strongest organizations make these connections explicit, especially for BIPOC professionals who have historically been excluded from them.
Tie compensation conversations to performance, scope, and impact, with transparent criteria. Vague compensation conversations produce inequitable outcomes.
Where Employee Relations Fits
Investment cultures still need formal channels for the moments when inclusion breaks down. AllVoices' employee relations function support helps HR teams handle those moments with consistency. Our HR case management system holds the trail of every concern, response, and outcome in one place.
How does ER reinforce a team-investment strategy?
ER teams see patterns that no other function sees. Repeated concerns tied to a single manager, team, or function are early signals that the investment strategy is not reaching everyone equally. Sharing those patterns with leaders, with appropriate confidentiality, gives the company a chance to fix the gap before it shows up in attrition.
That feedback loop is what keeps investment from feeling performative.
Frequently Asked Questions About Investing in Your Team
What is the difference between mentorship and sponsorship?
Mentorship is advice and support. Sponsorship is active advocacy that opens doors. Both matter, but sponsorship is what most often translates into senior-level career outcomes.
How do you measure whether team investment is reaching everyone?
Use promotion rates, pay data, access to stretch assignments, and engagement scores broken down by demographic group. Trend lines over time matter more than any single quarter.
How do anonymous channels fit a culture of trust?
They give employees a way to raise concerns that direct conversation cannot yet hold. Used well, with consistent follow-up, they build the trust that supports more open conversation later.
How do you keep DEI work from being cut in a downturn?
Frame it as performance and risk reduction. Quantify the cost of attrition, lost productivity, and ER cases tied to inclusion failures. Make the business case explicit.
How do you start building this in a company that has not done it before?
Start with listening. Run an honest employee survey, look at promotion and pay data, and map where the gaps are. Build from the data rather than from assumptions.
What's the first step for HR leaders who want to put this into practice?
Start with one team and one measurable outcome. Pick a function where the issue shows up sharply and a leader who is willing to model the new practice. Map the current state honestly: what is happening, who feels it, and what would good look like in ninety days. Share that picture with the team, ask them what is missing from your read, and adjust before launching anything formal. The goal of step one is alignment, not activity.
Once the picture is shared, pick two or three changes you can make inside one quarter. Resist the urge to launch a full program. Run the changes, measure the response with simple pulse questions, and report back. The combination of a focused team, a clear measure, and a public commitment to learn is what turns a good idea into a practice that spreads. HR leaders who try to launch everywhere at once usually end up launching nowhere.
Iterate from there. The teams that succeed treat the first cycle as a prototype, not a rollout. They keep what worked, drop what did not, and write down what they learned. By the time the practice expands to the next group, it has been pressure-tested by people who have a stake in seeing it work. That is the unglamorous work of putting any people-strategy idea into practice, and it is also the work that compounds.
The Bottom Line for HR Leaders
Guy Primus's work on closing the racial wealth gap and creating spaces where BIPOC professionals thrive points to a clear pattern. Companies that invest in their people, with sponsorship, anonymous feedback, transparent compensation, and ER infrastructure that catches inclusion failures, get the best work in return.
That investment is not a perk; it is part of how high-performing teams run. Skip it, and the cost shows up in attrition, lost productivity, and missed opportunities the company will never know it had.
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)